Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 1766 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 2042 than Celeron G1820 - 159 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 48 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 53 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £5.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76925 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
39.75708502024292%
Multi-Core
825
11.13811259619279%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
Colfax | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
48 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
250 W | TDP | 53 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |