Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 2227 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 5% better in Halo Infinite than FX-4130 - 159 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 48 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 125 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FX-4130
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
| Colfax | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
48 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 250 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
