Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900F is 895 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 13% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 146 vs 129 FPS
- Up to 32% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £238.66 vs £351.64
- Up to 40% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £1.63 vs £2.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
129
88.35616438356165%
Value, £/FPS
£2.73/FPS
59.70695970695971%
Price, £
£351.64
67%
Buy for £351.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1643 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
146
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.63/FPS
100%
Price, £
£238.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £238.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1642 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
58.68263473053892%
Multi-Core
7454
81.2779413368226%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |