Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7900X outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7900X is 45 days older than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-7900X - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 5% better in Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 58 vs 55 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £428.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
82.34880450070324%
Multi-Core
7539
85.85582507687052%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |