Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Core i7-3930K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 2096 days newer than Core i7-3930K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 5% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i7-3930K - 291 vs 277 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3930K - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3930K
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 130 vs 180 Watts
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Core i7-3930K
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3930K
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Single-Core
606
51.750640478223744%
Multi-Core
2961
39.27576601671309%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i7-3930K |
|---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
