Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 2129 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 5% better in Valheim than FX-4100 - 198 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
