Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1960 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 22% better in Overwatch 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 418 vs 344 FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 150 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for £579.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65817 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
37.61674718196457%
Multi-Core
5794
26.537809737553246%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |