Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 779 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - £163.77 vs £772.59
- Up to 78% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-10920X - £0.81 vs £3.7 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 209 vs 201 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 165 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 24 vs 16 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
201
96%
Value, £/FPS
£0.81/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £163.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
209
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.7/FPS
21%
Price, £
£772.59
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for £772.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i9-10920X |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Whitehaven | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |