Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7500T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7500T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 240 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7500T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 2% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-7500T - 104 vs 102 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Up to 63% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - £74.14 vs £199.67
- Up to 62% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - £0.73 vs £1.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
104
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.92/FPS
38%
Price, £
£199.67
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for £199.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
102
98%
Value, £/FPS
£0.73/FPS
100%
Price, £
£74.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £74.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i5-7500T |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |