Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i5-4460 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1208 days newer than Core i5-4460.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 2% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-4460 - 123 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 84 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Core i5-4460
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-4460
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Single-Core
1051
89.98287671232876%
Multi-Core
2928
50.53503624439075%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i5-4460 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | May 11th, 2014 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
