Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 165 days older than Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 1% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Ryzen 3 2200G - 213 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Ryzen 3 2200G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 2200G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Single-Core
997
85.3595890410959%
Multi-Core
2858
49.326889886089056%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
