Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 9% better in World of Tanks than Core i9-10900 - 590 vs 543 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900 - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Up to 20% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - £474.99 vs £594.59
- Up to 14% better value when playing World of Tanks than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - £0.87 vs £1.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
590
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.01/FPS
86.13861386138613%
Price, £
£594.59
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for £594.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
543
92.03389830508475%
Value, £/FPS
£0.87/FPS
100%
Price, £
£474.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £474.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1704
58.396161754626455%
Multi-Core
8421
42.892069474863746%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raphael | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |