Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 2163 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 17% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 139 vs 119 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 145 vs 170 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Ryzen 9 7950X
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Raphael | Codename | Broadwell |
| AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 16 | Cores | 22 |
| 32 | Threads | 44 |
4.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 170 W | TDP | 145 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
45.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
