Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 3626 days newer than FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 8% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than FX-8350 - 241 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 125 vs 170 Watts
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 9 7950X
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
| Raphael | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
4.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 170 W | TDP | 125 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
45.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
