Buy on Amazon
£39.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $699
Availability
MSRP in USD: $699
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 3438 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 91% better in Starfield than FX-6350 - 84 vs 44 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 32 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 125 vs 170 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-6350 Black Edition CPU (AM3+, Hex Core, 3.90GHz, 14MB, 125W, Advanced Bit Manipulation)
Buy for £39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 9 7950X
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
| Raphael | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
4.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 170 W | TDP | 125 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
45.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Ryzen 9 7950X or FX-6350
Starfield, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
55 FPS
£34.27/FPS
GeForce RTX 4070
Ryzen 9 7950X
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
£1,884.99
In Stock
84 FPS
£52.45/FPS
GeForce RTX 4090
Ryzen 9 7950X
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
£4,406.19
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
