Buy on Amazon
£382.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $599
Availability
MSRP in USD: $599
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms Core i7-5820K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 3047 days newer than Core i7-5820K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 11% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-5820K - 282 vs 254 FPS
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 120 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5820K - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D Desk-top Processor (12-core/24-thread, 140MB cache, up to 5.6 GHz max boost)
Buy for £382.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74066 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Ryzen 9 7900X3D
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Core i7-5820K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-5820K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1160
41.105598866052446%
Multi-Core
5443
31.140225413353168%
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D | vs | Intel Core i7-5820K |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Raphael | Codename | Haswell E |
| AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 140 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
44.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Ryzen 9 7900X3D or Core i7-5820K
Monster Hunter: World, 1920 x 1080, Highest
178 FPS
£10.31/FPS
GeForce RTX 4070
Ryzen 9 7900X3D
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
£1,834.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
