Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7845HX outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7845HX is 3537 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
- Performs up to 27% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-4350 - 214 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 24 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3727 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Dragon Range | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket FL1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Radeon 610M | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |