Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 3312 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 80% better in War Thunder than FX-4100 - 230 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 95 vs 105 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
230
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.19/FPS
100%
Price, £
£272.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £272.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Vermeer | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |