Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 2622 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 20% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 203 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 9% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 105 vs 115 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 24 vs 20 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
203
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.28/FPS
100%
Price, £
£259.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £259.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 209 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Vermeer | Codename | Ivy Bridge EP |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 115 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |