Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms Ryzen 9 4900HS on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 424 days older than Ryzen 9 4900HS.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Metro Exodus than Ryzen 9 4900HS - 146 vs 145 FPS
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
146
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.33/FPS
100%
Price, £
£340
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £340 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Mar 7th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Renoir | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |