Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 2589 days newer than FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 8% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-8350 - 161 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 32 vs 8 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
161
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.11/FPS
100%
Price, £
£499.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £499.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Matisse | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |