Buy on Amazon
£5.56
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8700G is 4053 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
- Performs up to 10% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron G1610 - 232 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 8700G - 55 vs 65 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
BQTEC Intel Celeron G1610 2.60 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread 2 MB Cache 55 W CPU Processor LGA 1155
Buy for £5.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen 7 8700G
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
15.860014892032762%
Multi-Core
739
5.1914295749912185%
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Not Available | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 55 W |
4 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Radeon 780M | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
