Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms the more expensive Core i3-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X is 995 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-8300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-8300 - 217 vs 203 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i3-8300 - £178.0 vs £188.88
- Up to 12% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-8300 - £0.82 vs £0.93 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8300 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X - 62 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
217
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.82/FPS
100%
Price, £
£178
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £178 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10325 minutes ago
Buy for £188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10325 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | vs | Intel Core i3-8300 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2018 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Vermeer | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
105 W | TDP | 62 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |