Buy on Amazon
£225.81
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G2120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G2120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800 is 3053 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G2120.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800
- Performs up to 19% better in Battlefield IV than Pentium G2120 - 446 vs 374 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G2120 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G2120
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5800 - £14.21 vs £225.81
- Up to 92% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen 7 5800 - £0.04 vs £0.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 5800
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2021
FPS
446
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.51/FPS
7.8431372549019605%
Price, £
£225.81
6%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzensets 7 5800 XT Processor (8 Cores/16 Threads, 105W DTP, AM4 Socket, 36MB Cache, Up to 4.8 GHz max boost frequency, Wraith Prism Cooler)
Buy for £225.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 344 minutes ago
Pentium G2120
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
374
83.85650224215246%
Value, £/FPS
£0.04/FPS
100%
Price, £
£14.21
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium G2120 CPU Used 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop Processor 3.1 GHz 3M 55W LGA1155
Buy for £14.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 344 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 5800
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2021
Pentium G2120
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5800 | vs | Intel Pentium G2120 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Pentium |
| Vermeer | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
