Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 4800H outperforms Xeon E3-1280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 4800H is 3200 days newer than Xeon E3-1280.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E3-1280 - 122 vs 113 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1280 - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Ryzen 7 4800H
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Xeon E3-1280
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1280 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2011 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
| Renoir | Codename | Sandy Bridge-EP |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Graphics 448SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
