Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 643 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 6% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 137 vs 129 FPS
- Up to 42% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £365.0 vs £629.22
- Up to 45% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £2.66 vs £4.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 105 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 24 vs 16 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
137
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.66/FPS
100%
Price, £
£365
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £365 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6137 minutes ago
Buy for £629.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Matisse | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |