Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 1041 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 154 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 105 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 55% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3800XT - £163.79 vs £365.0
- Up to 54% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen 7 3800XT - £1.1 vs £2.37 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £365 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
149
96%
Value, £/FPS
£1.1/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £163.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Matisse | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |