Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Ryzen 7 3750H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1115 days newer than Ryzen 7 3750H.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 35 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 13% better in Overwatch 2 than Ryzen 7 3750H - 379 vs 334 FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
379
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.2/FPS
100%
Price, £
£70
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Picasso | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 58 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Radeon Vega 10 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |