Buy on Amazon
£220
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 2498 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 8% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-3240T - 137 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 3700X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
137
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.61/FPS
100%
Price, £
£220
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X Processor (8C/16T, 36 MB Cache, 4.4 GHz Max Boost)
Buy for £220 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 3700X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
|---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Matisse | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
