Buy on Amazon
£154.77
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $2749
Availability
MSRP in USD: $2749
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 373 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - £154.77 vs £2336.49
- Up to 93% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - £1.49 vs £22.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 64 vs 16 threads
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 3700X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
104
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.49/FPS
100%
Price, £
£154.77
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X Processor (8C/16T, 36 MB Cache, 4.4 GHz Max Boost)
Buy for £154.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
104
100%
Value, £/FPS
£22.47/FPS
6%
Price, £
£2336.49
6%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX (32C/64T, 144 MB Cache, up to 4.2 GHz Max Boost)
Buy for £2,336.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 3700X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Matisse | Codename | Castle Peak |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 32 |
| 16 | Threads | 64 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
| 7 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
