Buy on Amazon
£230
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $107
Availability
MSRP in USD: $107
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 1145 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 20% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron 3205U - 104 vs 87 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 15 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
104
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.21/FPS
100%
Price, £
£230
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD YD270XBGAFBOX Ryzen 7 2700X Processor with Wraith Prism RGB LED Cooler
Buy for £230 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8442 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Celeron 3205U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | vs | Intel Celeron 3205U |
|---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2015 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Broadwell |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.5 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 105 W | TDP | 15 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 15.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
