Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms the cheaper Pentium Gold G6405 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium Gold G6405 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 1062 days older than the cheaper Pentium Gold G6405.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 4% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Pentium Gold G6405 - 167 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Up to 71% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700 - £65.16 vs £225.0
- Up to 70% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 7 2700 - £0.4 vs £1.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 58 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11016 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
161
96%
Value, £/FPS
£0.4/FPS
100%
Price, £
£65.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £65.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11015 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 58 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |