Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700 is 906 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Performs up to 5% better in FIFA 23 than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 132 vs 126 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 65 vs 85 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 16 vs 12 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
132
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.89/FPS
100%
Price, £
£250
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
---|---|---|
Mar 2nd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Haswell-E |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 85 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |