Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G is 3102 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
- Performs up to 19% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron G1620 - 438 vs 368 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G - 55 vs 65 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2021
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
21.560358460727464%
Multi-Core
723
10.303548525010688%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2021 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Cezanne | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Radeon Vega 7 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
