Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 82 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - £182.32 vs £213.0
- Up to 13% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i9-10900KF - £0.87 vs £1.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Escape From Tarkov than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - 214 vs 210 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - 20 vs 12 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
210
98%
Value, £/FPS
£0.87/FPS
100%
Price, £
£182.32
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £182.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
Buy for £213 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Renoir | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon Vega 7 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |