Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1367 days newer than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 227 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 32 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 15 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
