Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 1402 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 44% better in HITMAN 2 than Celeron G3930 - 169 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 76% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600X - £29.99 vs £126.99
- Up to 65% better value when playing HITMAN 2 than Ryzen 5 5600X - £0.26 vs £0.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600X doesn't have integrated graphics
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £126.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11475 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
117
69%
Value, £/FPS
£0.26/FPS
100%
Price, £
£29.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £29.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11475 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Vermeer | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |