Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600G outperforms Xeon E5-2678 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 213 vs 198 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 5600G - 24 vs 12 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
FPS
213
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.51/FPS
100%
Price, £
£109
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £109 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Server/Workstation
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 |
---|---|---|
Apr 13th, 2021 | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Cezanne | Codename | Haswell-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Radeon Vega 7 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |