Key Differences
In short — Xeon w7-2495X outperforms Ryzen 5 4600HS on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon w7-2495X is 1136 days newer than Ryzen 5 4600HS.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon w7-2495X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon w7-2495X
- Performs up to 32% better in Starfield than Ryzen 5 4600HS - 74 vs 56 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS - 48 vs 12 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Server/Workstation • Feb 15th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS | vs | Intel Xeon w7-2495X |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 15th, 2023 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon W |
Renoir | Codename | Sapphire Rapids |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 4677 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 48 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |