Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms Ryzen 5 4600H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 258 days older than Ryzen 5 4600H.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 2% better in Saints Row than Ryzen 5 4600H - 164 vs 161 FPS
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
164
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.58/FPS
100%
Price, £
£258.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £258.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13969 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Renoir | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |