Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 4600H outperforms Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 4600H is 2884 days newer than Core i7-3820.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
- Performs up to 7% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-3820 - 167 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 45 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Ryzen 5 4600H
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Single-Core
617
45.467943994104644%
Multi-Core
2299
45.56084026952041%
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Renoir | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 130 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
