Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 373 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Up to 96% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - £96.25 vs £2378.05
- Up to 96% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - £1.2 vs £29.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 1% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Ryzen 5 3600 - 81 vs 80 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 64 vs 12 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
80
98.76543209876543%
Value, £/FPS
£1.2/FPS
100%
Price, £
£96.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £96.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2596 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
81
100%
Value, £/FPS
£29.36/FPS
4.087193460490464%
Price, £
£2378.05
4%
FPS Winner
Buy for £2,378.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2596 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1597
96.49546827794562%
Multi-Core
6884
47.21860209890939%
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Matisse | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 32 |
12 | Threads | 64 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |