Buy on Amazon
£50
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $313
Availability
MSRP in USD: $313
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3500X is 2704 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
- Performs up to 6% better in HITMAN 3 than Core i7-3770K - 203 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - £50.0 vs £214.9
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 65 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3500X - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3500X doesn't have integrated graphics
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
Buy for £50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
Intel 3rd Generation Core i7-3770K CPU (4 x 3.50GHz, Ivy Bridge, Socket 1155, 8Mb L3 Cache, Intel Turbo Boost Technology 2.0)
Buy for £214.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 3500X
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
Core i7-3770K
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3770K
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
707
45.466237942122184%
Multi-Core
2469
42.205128205128204%
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
|---|---|---|
Sep 24th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Matisse | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
| 6 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
