Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 3500X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 833 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 5 3500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen 5 3500X - 424 vs 422 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3500X - £58.99 vs £72.44
- Up to 18% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen 5 3500X - £0.14 vs £0.17 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
FPS
422
99.52830188679245%
Value, £/FPS
£0.17/FPS
82.3529411764706%
Price, £
£72.44
81%
Buy for £72.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1620 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
424
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.14/FPS
100%
Price, £
£58.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £58.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1619 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 24th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Matisse | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |