Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2388G outperforms Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2388G is 794 days newer than Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2388G - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2388G
- Performs up to 8% better in Halo Infinite than Ryzen 5 3400G - 171 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 16 vs 8 threads
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
158
92.39766081871345%
Value, £/FPS
£0.41/FPS
100%
Price, £
£64.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £64.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58296 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1128
49.08616187989556%
Multi-Core
3619
36.21535074552186%
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | Intel Xeon E-2388G |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2021 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E |
Picasso | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P750 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |