Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9940X outperforms Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9940X is 261 days older than Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-9940X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9940X
- Performs up to 2% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Ryzen 5 3400G - 159 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 28 vs 8 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for £64.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76744 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1128
77.31322823851954%
Multi-Core
3619
33.715297186510156%
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | Intel Core i9-9940X |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |