Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 141 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 95% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - £64.99 vs £1250.0
- Up to 94% better value when playing Rust than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - £0.36 vs £6.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 13% better in Rust than Ryzen 5 3400G - 207 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 48 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
183
88.40579710144928%
Value, £/FPS
£0.36/FPS
100%
Price, £
£64.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £64.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60989 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
207
100%
Value, £/FPS
£6.04/FPS
5.960264900662252%
Price, £
£1250
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for £1,250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60988 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1128
67.66646670665867%
Multi-Core
3619
27.175790343170387%
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Picasso | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 48 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |