Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 2448 days newer than FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8300 - 182 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
182
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.41/FPS
100%
Price, £
£73.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £73.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Picasso | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |