Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2500X outperforms FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2500X is 1469 days newer than FX-8370.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than FX-8370 - 118 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Ryzen 5 2500X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FX-8370
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | AMD FX-8370 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
| Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
