Buy on Amazon
Out of Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $999
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 186 days older than Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 9% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Ryzen 5 2400G - 210 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 32 vs 8 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G Processor with Radeon Vega 11 Graphics - Wraith Stealth Cooler - YD2400C5FBBOX
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Ryzen 5 2400G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 2400G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Single-Core
1057
90.26473099914602%
Multi-Core
3294
43.69279745324314%
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.